A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children household at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier along with the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a business director respectively, find to create their loved ones residence. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, in which progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of founded people. In accordance with the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying manufactured by their prospective neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under preparing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally inhabitants of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their setting up permission by creating a wall past the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment on the Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result places are issue to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments might have lasting ecological effects, significantly inside a sensitive coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that's partially built, is in the right placement. Their authorized group has characterised the action being an try and delay or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, in which views of The ocean are equally very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, As outlined by sworn proof referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-higher h2o during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions, an image which includes given that turn out to be emblematic from the intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they have been meant to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location became Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment in the legal timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was approved and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and ailments connected to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to organizing law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A personal look at, insisting instead that it is about guaranteeing that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have explained their extended-standing relationship to the area as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply seeking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all operates are performed according to Skilled assistance and approved ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over design of wall at coastal site happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has become extra contentious.
The Irish Periods write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court docket must figure out if the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and arranging problems. Nevertheless the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. What's more, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary concerns such as environmental security and residence rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful issues. Whether or not it will finally be altered, removed, or completed as planned will depend on the court’s results. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most carefully watched scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.