A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among future neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal web page in the north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated countrywide interest pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their possible neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, therefore regions are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly crafted, is in the proper posture. Their legal staff has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their watch, an allegation which has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are the two really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic on the intensity on the dispute. These steps weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site in the sea Irish Instances documented, describing how The 2 Males entered the water all through significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the positioning grew to become Probably the most hanging descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of steps were cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected in detail via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
Within the core of your dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as created, goes past what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his assessment of scheduling documents, maps, and conditions connected towards the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public watch, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their long-standing relationship to the realm as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair basically attempting to create a family dwelling in accordance with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Specific Spot of Conservation and say that every one performs have been completed based upon Qualified suggestions and approved options. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, tend not to change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute more than development of wall at coastal web page has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become far more contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been involved in community advocacy on scheduling and environmental problems, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In René Collier the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin lately.